Yesterday was
World Contraception Day. Ms. Magazine's article
A Zero-Cost Way to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy was interesting and no, the solution is not abstinence! The proposed solution is to extend the length of prescriptions so women don't run out of the pill. As someone who used to be on the pill for years, and as someone who takes other medications now, having a short-term script is extremely annoying. For one, I don't have health insurance and having to sit in the local free clinic for hours to walk in and spend less than five minutes with a doctor to get a prescription filled is extremely annoying. Even when I make an appointment with the local planned parenthood, by the time I realize something is running out or already ran out, there is then the additional time spent waiting to get said appointment.
When something is over-the-counter and it runs out, I run the risk of missing maybe a day, or I can walk into the store and buy it when I see I'm running out. When taking a prescription and it runs out, I run the risk of missing many days, especially with the added effort involved. It could be argued that why can't the same thinking be used for prescriptions. Any added step makes something more work, and also more time consuming, which most people don't have. It's different to have to stop by a local pharmacy or market to pick up multivitamins, then it is to have to call and schedule an appointment with a doctor that costs more money just be seen, then the added cost of the prescription, plus the time spent waiting in the waiting room, then the added time waiting in the doctor's office.
Leah Berkenwald says,
"Running out of pills can cause women miss or skip a day or two or more,
which reduces the effectiveness of the Pill in preventing pregnancy.
Longer supplies could help the growing numbers of uninsured or
underinsured women who can’t cover the cost of a doctor’s visit every
three months. They could also provide a safety net for women who
unexpectedly lose their jobs and thus their health insurance coverage,
and have not budgeted for the full out-of-pocket prescription price
(which can be as much as $180 for a three-month supply). In this economy, that is a very real concern."
The issue I have with talking about
contraception and only talking about the pill is that when having heterosexual sex, there is more to be concerned with then whether or not pregnancy is the outcome. And with the recent
Massive Birth Control Recall, I think talking about other forms of birth control is extremely important; birth control that protects the woman from not only getting pregnant unintentionally, but also protects from sexually transmitted diseases. While avoiding pregnancy is seen as the biggest concern, and while I myself have taken necessary precautions to avoid having to invoke my right to choose, I also don't want to contract any STDs. There are so many brands and types of condoms and these are the kind of birth control that if you run out of your script, or if you're not on one, you can walk into the market and buy a package whenever!
Do you think prescriptions for the pill should be written for short-term or long-term? Do you think the conversation between birth control and protection against STDs can be separated? Do you agree or disagree that both are extremely important issues to discuss when talking about sex? Comment below or email me shapedbymylife@gmail.com
